Our local Auburn Journal newspaper continues it's obsession with imaginary and exaggerated snake-like objects.
First, the Auburn Journal printed their original tale, stating incredulously that this "8-foot long reptile" ... "could eat a child"...
http://auburnjournal.com/detail/158541.html
Then, the big-city Sacramento Bee published a toned-down "fat and happy five-foot-long rattlesnake" version of the same story:
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/09/13/3025794/rattlesnake-found-at-treatment.html
Then the El Dorado Irrigation District submitted a press release straight from the horses (or reptile's) mouth (or fangs) with the actual length and ultimate fate of the serpent:
http://www.eid.org/03_news/Rattlesnake_20100909.htm
For context, here's the Auburn Journal's July 2010 story about imaginary anacondas in Meadow Vista:
http://auburnjournal.com/detail/154406.html
And finally, here's our instructions on how to capture and relocate a rattlesnake, Rural-Mysteries-Style:
http://www.ruralmysteries.com/rattlesnake.shtml
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment